Tom Calton: Everyone Wants the GM1… But THIS Is Cheaper, Faster & Better!
Tom writes:
The Panasonic Lumix GM1 and GM5 are 2 of the best pocket-sized mirrorless cameras ever made – but, they’re pretty pricey to buy right now. Well, I found an alternative that’s cheaper, faster and maybe even better…
MicroFourNerds: Is OM-3 REALLY good enough? My FULL Experience!
OM-3 at BHphoto, Amazon, Adorama, OM store USA.
MicroFourNerds writes:
I took the OM System OM-3 to Valencia for two weeks and REALLY put this camera to the test…
Techradar: OM-1 is still the best the best wildlife photography camera in 2025
Techradar voted the OM-1 the best camera for wildlife photography in 2025:
OM System is the only brand to officially mark the weather-proofing rating of its cameras, in this case it’s a rugged IP53-rating. You’ll really see the benefit of the MFT system when you add a super telephoto lens on the OM-1: most MFT lenses are so much smaller than full-frame equivalents.
Lumix GH7 Review at PCMag
GH7 at Amazon, Bhphoto, Adorama, FotoErhardt, Calumet, WexUk.
PCmag reviewed the Panasonic Lumix GH7 and concluded:
The Lumix DC-GH7 is a relatively quick replacement for the discontinued GH6, but it makes some important changes to the image sensor. We’re happy to see Panasonic put its relatively young phase detection autofocus system into the GH line, even if its adoption of the tech comes late in the game versus the bulk of its competitors, all of which have had this type of focus in mirrorless cameras for years. We also appreciate that it brings the improved dynamic range from the G9 II to the table. The GH7 costs a bit more than the G9 II, our top-rated Micro Four Thirds camera and current Editors’ Choice among hybrid photo-video models. The GH7 leans more strongly into video, both in feature set and body design, and justifies its $300 premium over the G9 II for creators who will take advantage of ProRes or frequently record long-form content.
OM-3 Imatest at Photoreview
OM-3 at BHphoto, Amazon, Adorama, OM store USA.
Photoreview made an Imatest of the OM-3 and concluded:
The results we obtained from different ISO settings suggested users should keep sensitivity setting at or below ISO 1600 when they require optimal image quality.
